Contact: Dr. Reid A. Holland
Thanks to:

Joe Chinnes, Instructional Delivery, Midlands Technical College

Student Evaluations
This page contains the summary results of two classroom research projects:

1. Student Utilization of Web Images

2. Instruction Time over the Web--Is it Different from Regular Classes?

 
 

Student Utilization of Hybrid Web Course Elements

Introduction

Research Question: How do students perceive the visual and interactive elements of a CD-web hybrid history course?

Methodology: Population surveys conducted of all History 201 and History 202 sections offered over the Internet from Spring 1999 to Fall 1999.

Population: The population number in four sections was sixty-four.

Population demographics are currently being analyzed. Of the respondents, 51 percent were male; 68 percent have one year or more experience with the Internet; and 20 percent have taken another Internet class.

A copy of the survey instrument is available from the author.

 

Summary

Results were summed and scaled according to the response scale of the survey. A result score of (1) would indicate perfect ratings of "strongly agree"; (2) "agree"; (3) "uncertainty"; (4) "disagree"; and (5) "strongly disagree".

QUESTION/STATEMENT*

RESULT SCORE

1. the course provides extensive imagery?

1.5

2. the course overcomes long download time?

1.5

3. the course provides repeated instructor contacts?

1.7

4. the imagery provides vivid reminders of content?

1.9

5. the web material augments the textbook?

1.9

6. the course provides easy web navigation?

2.0

7. the course encourages easy navigation between units?

2.0

8. the course encourages other exploratory learning?

1.5

9. the course allows you to test your knowledge?

1.7

10. each chapter in the course can be completed in 12 hours?

*briefly re-stated, see survey for complete question

2.8

Discussion

These results indicate that the hybrid system does ease download time in the view of student users. Student respondents also indicate a clear agreement that the web course organization encourages the exploration of other resources. Students reported strong agreement that the web course does facilitate contact with the instructor and does allow students to self-test their knowledge.

 

Instruction Time Over the Web, Is it Different?

Introduction

In order to asses both the development time and the teaching time involved in web classes, the author has kept a time log of basic activities over three semesters--Spring 1999, Summer 1999, and Fall 1999. This report focuses on the time and tasks involved in direct teaching activities of web based courses in American history.

The time log was designed to attempt to compare direct teaching activities in a regularly scheduled class with those encountered in a web class. These activities were listed on a sheet with corresponding dates. On an every-other-day basis hash marks for actives were recorded to the whole minute. Initially, the activities for the web courses were inadequate to record the myriad of tasks involved, but these were revised satisfactorily by the fourth week of the first semester.

To emphasize comparison teaching tasks from typical regularly scheduled classes were grouped in the following categories:

  • general questions, before and after class

  • lecturing, providing information, analyses, and/or comparisons

  • discussion

  • class management (role taking, etc.)

  • instructional technology management (queuing a video, starting a Power Point presentation, etc.)

  • assisting students with resources, research, and technical questions

The logged times strictly excluded all course development activities such as preparation, reading and research, writing course materials, publishing course materials, copying and other related professional and course development activities.

Times logged in also excluded student advising of both a formal nature (course selection, writing plans of study, etc.) and the informal nature. As this project unfolded this decision was probably a mistake. My subjective view is that it is easier to advise web based students, but that notion needs to be tested.

Results

The table below summarizes the results of the time log through October 15, 1999.

Internet Teaching

Scheduled Class Teaching
(min. per week)

Web Class Teaching
(min. per week)

Web Difference
(min. per week)

1. General questions before and after class (30) 1. General questions (45) 1. +45—general questions were very similar regarding progress, assignments, personal issues
2. Lecturing or providing information, analysis, comparison (120) 2. Providing information, analysis, comparison (60) 2. –60—most of the web course information and critical analysis was posted on the web as a part of extensive course development
3. Class discussion (30) 3. Discussion webs, email discussion, and other discussion (90) 3. +60—significantly more discussion

4. Class management tasks (9) 4. Web class management (24) 4. +15


5. Technical "fidgeting" to get a video cued, or install and run instructional technology (9) 5. Web class fidgeting (36) 5. +17—excludes major maintenance, downtime, diagnostics, etc. But still a significant difference
6. Assisting students with technical information or resources; i.e., access to web, access and use of library materials (15)
6. Giving students technical assistance (35) 6. +20—this average is skewed toward the first three weeks as students become more familiar with the I-class
total time=213 total time=290 difference=77; 136% of the regularly scheduled class
Discussion

Clearly, the teaching activities associated with web instruction are more involved than "going to class". However, of the additional 77 minutes per week involved in web teaching, 71 minutes (or 92% of the difference) involves technical issues such as adjustments, giving students technical assistance, and other technical issues. The college does not currently support a student help desk, nor does it have a 7/24 help desk for staff and faculty; therefore, this extra time is to be expected. This time may also be reduced in the future should such help be provided.

After technical hurdles have been overcome, the amount of teaching time for regular and web classes is very similar. The use of that time is very different. As shown above, the web classes involve more discussion time--almost the exact reverse of the time required in regularly scheduled classes.